micheleandClaude Sonnet 5
3cdaeaee35
Post-M10, user-requested final benchmark campaign: 6 realistic workloads (16-256 independent neurons in a shared-input dense-layer shape, a random-seeded 2-layer network with real cross-node PSRAM forwarding, and a 6-node 2-hop dependency diamond) x 4 concurrency levels (N_SLOTS=1/2/4/8) through the real, full neural_multiprocessor system (real V1 PSRAM chain, real slot_mem_arbiter). 24/24 runs PASS bit-exact against a software golden model (11,520 individual neuron/ node checks, zero mismatches). Three real bugs found and fixed during the campaign itself (ERR-0009): 1. neural_director.v (M5) had a real RTL bug at N_SLOTS=1 ($clog2(1)=0 makes a replication expression illegal) - never caught because M5-M10 only ever tested N_SLOTS=2/4/8. Fixed with a width-agnostic '0 literal; M5's own testbench re-verified unaffected. 2/3. Two testbench sizing bugs in tb_benchmark_suite.v itself (psram_model DEPTH too small for the Large workload's address range; N_NODES too small for the Stress workload's node-id range, causing a real deadlock via node-id wraparound colliding with an already-DISPATCHED node - a real, honest consequence of DEC-0008's own "no node-slot reclamation" design choice). Headline finding: real parallel scaling is essentially flat beyond N_SLOTS=2 - the single shared PSRAM port saturates at ~91% utilization regardless of slot count, so memory-bound workloads gain only 1.05-1.06x real speedup from N=1 to N=8. Once real POST-P&R Fmax degradation is also factored in, N_SLOTS=4 is measurably 21% SLOWER in real wall-clock time than N_SLOTS=1 for the largest workload tested. N_SLOTS=2 is recommended as the default (DEC-0014, superseding DEC-0012's resource-only "N_SLOTS=8 ceiling" framing for general use). Full 21-section report (every number classified THEORETICAL/ SIMULATED/POST-P&R MEASURED/DERIVED, per the user's own methodology requirements): hardware/v2/docs/benchmarks/ final-benchmark.md Logged: simulation/synthesis/timing/benchmark/decisions (DEC-0014)/ experiments (EXP-0014)/errors (ERR-0009)/development.log, ROADMAP.md updated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013xXuuRUWZScuo1DeYJxs3v
118 lines
6.2 KiB
Plaintext
118 lines
6.2 KiB
Plaintext
# V2 timing log -- solo append, mai troncato/sovrascritto (vedi README.md)
|
|
# Nessuna entry ancora -- popolato incrementalmente man mano che avanza lo sviluppo V2.
|
|
|
|
[2026-09-05] EXP-0001 -- neural_processor (P_IN=8, ACC_WIDTH=32)
|
|
nextpnr-ecp5 --45k --package CABGA381 --speed 8 --freq 80
|
|
--lpf-allow-unconstrained
|
|
Fmax: 183.12 MHz -- PASS at 80 MHz (real place&route measurement)
|
|
Critical path: job_ready -> TRELLIS_IO output pad (i.e. the design's
|
|
own logic is NOT the bottleneck at this Fmax -- an unconstrained
|
|
output pin dominates; a real system-level Fmax will differ once
|
|
this signal is consumed on-chip instead of driven to a pad in
|
|
isolation). Log: hardware/v2/synthesis/neural_processor_p8/nextpnr.log
|
|
WNS/TNS: not reported by this nextpnr version in this invocation.
|
|
|
|
[2026-09-05] EXP-0002 -- neural_processor (P_IN=8, ACC_WIDTH=24)
|
|
Same command as above, ACC_WIDTH=24 build.
|
|
Fmax: 176.21 MHz -- PASS at 80 MHz (real place&route measurement)
|
|
Delta vs ACC_WIDTH=32: -6.91 MHz (-3.8%) despite FEWER resources --
|
|
attributed to placement noise, not a real architectural effect
|
|
(no seed sweep run to confirm either way -- see experiments.log
|
|
EXP-0002 and benchmark.log). Log: hardware/v2/synthesis/
|
|
neural_processor_p8_acc24/nextpnr.log
|
|
|
|
[2026-09-05] EXP-0003 -- N_PROCESSORS sweep (P_IN=8), real nextpnr-ecp5
|
|
--45k --package CABGA381 --speed 8 --freq 80 --lpf-allow-unconstrained
|
|
N=1: Fmax=159.11 MHz PASS MULT18X18D 8/72 (11%)
|
|
N=2: Fmax=149.59 MHz PASS MULT18X18D 16/72 (22%)
|
|
N=4: Fmax=151.01 MHz PASS MULT18X18D 32/72 (44%)
|
|
N=8: Fmax=134.70 MHz PASS MULT18X18D 64/72 (88%)
|
|
TRELLIS_IO stays at 18/245 (7%) throughout (harness has only
|
|
clk/rst/seed/checksum as real pins, by design -- see ERR-0005).
|
|
See decisions.log DEC-0005: DSP, not Fmax or LUT/FF, is the resource
|
|
that will first prevent scaling N_PROCESSORS further at P_IN=8.
|
|
|
|
[2026-09-05] EXP-0004 -- default-depth buffer configs, real nextpnr-ecp5
|
|
activation_buffer (D=4096): Fmax=325.20 MHz PASS
|
|
weight_buffer (D=512): Fmax=339.67 MHz PASS
|
|
result_buffer (D=4096): Fmax=325.20 MHz PASS
|
|
All far above the 80MHz target -- buffers are not a timing concern in
|
|
isolation at these depths.
|
|
|
|
[2026-09-05] EXP-0005 -- memory_manager + prefetch_engine (via
|
|
harness_memory_manager.v, see errors.log ERR-0005 for why a harness
|
|
was needed), real nextpnr-ecp5 --45k --package CABGA381 --speed 8
|
|
--freq 80 --lpf-allow-unconstrained
|
|
Fmax: 165.86 MHz -- PASS at 80MHz (real place&route measurement)
|
|
|
|
[2026-09-05] EXP-0006 -- neural_director (via harness_neural_director.v,
|
|
see errors.log ERR-0005 for why), real nextpnr-ecp5 --45k --package
|
|
CABGA381 --speed 8 --freq 80 --lpf-allow-unconstrained
|
|
Fmax: 250.50 MHz -- PASS at 80MHz (real place&route measurement)
|
|
|
|
[2026-09-05] EXP-0007 -- dependency_manager (N_NODES=16, standalone,
|
|
no harness needed), real nextpnr-ecp5 --45k --package CABGA381
|
|
--speed 8 --freq 80 --lpf-allow-unconstrained
|
|
Fmax: 155.30 MHz -- PASS at 80MHz (real place&route measurement)
|
|
|
|
[2026-09-05] EXP-0008 -- dataflow_core (via harness_dataflow_core.v,
|
|
see errors.log ERR-0005 for why a harness was needed), real
|
|
nextpnr-ecp5 --45k --package CABGA381 --speed 8 --freq 80
|
|
--lpf-allow-unconstrained
|
|
N_SLOTS=2: Fmax = 165.15 MHz -- PASS at 80MHz (real place&route)
|
|
N_SLOTS=4: Fmax = 133.19 MHz -- PASS at 80MHz (real place&route)
|
|
Fmax drops as N_SLOTS grows (more concurrent memory_manager+
|
|
neural_processor instances competing for the same routing fabric
|
|
around the shared neural_director/dependency_manager hub) -- both
|
|
configs still clear the 80MHz target with real margin.
|
|
|
|
[2026-09-05] EXP-0009 -- neural_multiprocessor (M8, N_SLOTS=2, real
|
|
standalone synthesis, no harness needed), real nextpnr-ecp5 --45k
|
|
--package CABGA381 --speed 8 --freq 80 --lpf-allow-unconstrained
|
|
Fmax: 142.45 MHz -- PASS at 80MHz (real place&route measurement)
|
|
|
|
[2026-09-05] EXP-0011 -- dataflow_core N_SLOTS=8 (via
|
|
harness_dataflow_core.v), real nextpnr-ecp5 --45k --package CABGA381
|
|
--speed 8 --freq 80 --lpf-allow-unconstrained
|
|
Fmax: 92.63 MHz -- PASS at 80MHz (real place&route measurement), but
|
|
with a much thinner margin than N_SLOTS=2 (165.15 MHz) or N_SLOTS=4
|
|
(133.19 MHz) -- Fmax falls monotonically with N_SLOTS (165.15 ->
|
|
133.19 -> 92.63 MHz for N_SLOTS=2/4/8) as routing congestion around
|
|
the shared neural_director/dependency_manager hub grows, while DSP
|
|
usage (88.9% at N_SLOTS=8) approaches its hard ceiling at the same
|
|
time -- see decisions.log DEC-0012.
|
|
|
|
[2026-09-05] EXP-0012 -- ACC_WIDTH 24 vs 32 real placement-seed sweep
|
|
(M10, "pipeline" axis, resolving EXP-0002's single-seed
|
|
inconclusiveness), 5 additional real nextpnr-ecp5 seeds (1-5) plus the
|
|
original default-seed run (EXP-0001/EXP-0002), same synthesized
|
|
netlists (hardware/v2/synthesis/neural_processor_p8/top.json and
|
|
neural_processor_p8_acc24/top.json), --45k --package CABGA381 --speed
|
|
8 --freq 80 --lpf-allow-unconstrained
|
|
ACC_WIDTH=32: seeds [default,1,2,3,4,5] -> [183.12, 164.85, 174.25,
|
|
168.83, 183.96, 145.73] MHz. n=6, mean=170.12 MHz, min=145.73 MHz,
|
|
max=183.96 MHz, stdev=14.16 MHz.
|
|
ACC_WIDTH=24: seeds [default,1,2,3,4,5] -> [176.21, 183.72, 180.57,
|
|
183.08, 185.49, 175.16] MHz. n=6, mean=180.71 MHz, min=175.16 MHz,
|
|
max=185.49 MHz, stdev=4.21 MHz.
|
|
Conclusion: over 6 real placement seeds, ACC_WIDTH=24 has a HIGHER
|
|
mean Fmax (+10.6 MHz, +6.2%) AND a much lower seed-to-seed variance
|
|
(stdev 4.21 vs 14.16 MHz, ~3.4x tighter) than ACC_WIDTH=32 --
|
|
EXP-0002's single-seed result (176.21 < 183.12, i.e. ACC=24 looked
|
|
WORSE) was placement-seed noise, not a real trend. See decisions.log
|
|
DEC-0013.
|
|
|
|
[2026-09-05] EXP-0014 -- neural_multiprocessor N_SLOTS=1 and N_SLOTS=4
|
|
(final benchmark campaign), real nextpnr-ecp5 --45k --package CABGA381
|
|
--speed 8 --freq 80 --lpf-allow-unconstrained
|
|
N_SLOTS=1: Fmax = 152.46 MHz -- PASS at 80MHz
|
|
N_SLOTS=4: Fmax = 113.38 MHz -- PASS at 80MHz
|
|
(N_SLOTS=2 reference, EXP-0009: 142.45 MHz)
|
|
Full real N_SLOTS sweep for the complete system (dataflow_core + real
|
|
V1 PSRAM chain + slot_mem_arbiter): 1 -> 152.46 MHz, 2 -> 142.45 MHz,
|
|
4 -> 113.38 MHz. Fmax falls monotonically as N_SLOTS grows (more
|
|
routing congestion around the shared director/dependency_manager/
|
|
arbiter hub), exactly the same trend already observed for
|
|
dataflow_core alone (M7/M10, EXP-0008/EXP-0011) but now measured for
|
|
the REAL FULL SYSTEM including the real PSRAM backend.
|