Adds FPGA-exclusive access to the onboard W25Q128JV SPI NOR flash for
weights/bias/network persistence, layered as spi_flash_master (raw SPI,
USRMCLK-driven) -> flash_copy_engine (flash<->PSRAM streaming, erase-
before-write, Page Program loop) -> flash_slot_manager (16-slot catalog
with CRC32), exposed via 8 new SPI opcodes (0x40-0x47). Fixes two
pre-existing bugs found during bring-up: a psram_controller.v request
lost during power-up, and a one-cycle-pulse race in the PSRAM arbiter
request handshake. Full simulation + real Yosys/nextpnr-ecp5 synthesis
verification (0 errors, Fmax 66.68MHz) in WORKLOG.md and
docs/FPGA-Neural-Flash-Subsystem-Verification.md.
Also updates docs/pinout to reflect the 56-signal real .lpf (3 new
flash pins) and documents the WRITE_RAM/READ_RAM host backpressure
risk found while testing this subsystem.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013xXuuRUWZScuo1DeYJxs3v
PSRAM page-mode read burst support in psram_controller.v: enables the
ISSI IS66WVE4M16EBLL-70BLI's page mode via its configuration-register
software-access sequence at boot (disabled by default on the real
chip), then keeps CE#/OE# asserted after a read so a same-page
continuation only pays tAPA (20ns) instead of a full tAA (70ns)
random access, with automatic tCEM-safe session closing. Only a WRITE
closes the page -- byte-enable changes do not, since
int8_memory_access.v alternates them on nearly every access and an
early implementation attempt that treated them as a close condition
measured a real regression (53.25->61.25 cycles/edge) before being
corrected (53.25->37.53 cycles/edge, +42% gather bandwidth).
sim/psram_model.v gained independent tAPA/tAA and tCEM enforcement
(with a real Verilog same-timestep event-ordering race found and
fixed via a #0 sync) so the regression proves real timing compliance,
not just data correctness. New sim/psram_page_mode_tb.v; full 26-file
regression suite re-run clean. Real nextpnr-ecp5 Fmax re-measured on
the full spi_neuron_top system: 75.73MHz (P2, up from 55.59MHz) and
65.13MHz (P8) -- still under the 80MHz target but not regressed, with
the critical path confirmed (not assumed) to remain entirely inside
neuron_parallel's accumulate chain, never psram_controller.
Also includes this session's other already-validated work: the graph
engine (Type #2 sparse-graph network: act_buffer, graph_engine,
netasm host assembler), real CABGA381 pinout (.lpf, place&route
verified) and physical IRQ_N/DATA_READY_N pins, and Phase 7 timing
closure logs -- all previously uncommitted, documented in WORKLOG.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LH3jPeJ3eFMfF2v8SQhpkk
Bumps ADDR_WIDTH's default from 22 to 23 bits across every RTL
module (neuron_memory, layer_sequencer, spi_engine, spi_neuron_top,
mem_arbiter, int8_memory_access, memory_interface, psram_controller,
memory_model) and every testbench that mirrors it, so the system's
byte-address space reaches the full 8 MiB the recommended PSRAM part
(ISSI IS66WVE4M16EBLL-70BLI, docs/FPGA-Neural-Hardware-Design.md §3)
actually provides -- previously only 4 MiB (half the chip) was
reachable, since int8_memory_access.v's byte->word address shift
(addr >> 1) turned the old 22-bit byte address into only 21 real word
bits, one short of the chip's real 22-bit word address (A0-A21). At
23 bits, that same shift lands exactly on all 22 chip address lines,
so the whole part is usable now instead of deferred to a future
widening.
Also fixes a stray 22'd11-sized literal in layer_sequencer.v's
descriptor-table address increment (numerically already safe via
Verilog's zero-extension, but now correctly unsized so it always
matches ADDR_WIDTH instead of silently assuming 22).
Updated docs/FPGA-NeuralNetwork-Engine.md's SPI protocol address-field
note (23 bits, top 1 reserved bit instead of 2) and
docs/FPGA-Neural-Hardware-Design.md's PSRAM section (the "chip has
one spare address line" framing is gone now that all 22 are wired
and used).
Full regression (all 11 ADDR_WIDTH-touching testbenches, plus a
Yosys elaboration check of spi_neuron_top with the new default and
no override) passes clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WQV3vS9TXaGDJ5cRfnfidt
Phase 7 (docs/FPGA-NeuralNetwork-Engine.md): re-ran nextpnr-ecp5 on
the already-synthesized Phase 5 spi_neuron_top netlists (top.json
reused, only placement re-seeded) at --seed 1/2/3 for both P8 and P2.
Both land in a tight band regardless of seed (P8: 39.5-40.6 MHz,
2.6% spread; P2: 42.5-45.0 MHz, 5.8% spread) -- confirms the Phase 5
timing shortfall is a real structural bottleneck, not placement
noise, unlike the much smaller same-tier benchmark design (<2%
utilization, huge placer freedom, genuinely noisy). Corrected the
earlier "pipeline the saturate stage" candidate fix, which targeted
Phase 4's critical path and not the one Phase 5's logic actually
shifted to; block RAM for x_mem/w_mem remains the leading candidate,
not yet implemented.
New docs/FPGA-Neural-Hardware-Design.md: draft hardware design doc
for a board carrying the project's actual target device
(LFE5U-45F-8BG381C) plus the parallel PSRAM rtl/psram_controller.v
is written for. Covers: why not the basic-ecp5-pcb reference board
(wrong package/speed grade, no RAM), a real I/O pin budget from
Lattice's own CABGA381 pinout table, a researched PSRAM part
(ISSI IS66WVE4M16EBLL-70BLI -- 70ns access matches the controller's
timing assumption exactly, with a note on the byte/word address
shift in int8_memory_access.v so the chip's top address line is
correctly left as spare headroom, not a wiring error), clock
(16 MHz, no PLL exists yet so CLK_FREQ_MHZ must match whatever
oscillator is fitted), power/config reusing the reference board's
proven circuitry and errata (config-SPI pin can't double as the
application SPI interface), and a BOM/open-items list.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WQV3vS9TXaGDJ5cRfnfidt