Before building N=4/8/16 core scaling, did the requested full
analysis. Real finding: using measured DDR3 throughput (1.24 GB/s,
from the actual EXP-0079 JEDEC trace) against calculated compute-side
need (4.96 GB/s for one core at peak DSP throughput, given the
current activation memory layout's 2x byte overhead), the system is
memory-bandwidth-bound already at N=1/N=2, not DSP-bound (only 6.67%
DSP used). Scaling core count today would show no real throughput
gain.
docs/ARCHITECTURE_ANALYSIS.md: full module review + ranked
interventions -- result-writeback engine (blocker), denser activation
packing (highest-leverage bandwidth fix), then the user's own proposed
DDRManager/orchestrator-prefetch idea (design-sketched, grounded in
neural_director_packed.v's existing job queue, explicitly scoped as
complementary to denser packing, not a substitute for it), THEN
N-scaling with real per-N P&R signoff.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MUG92aM9m68TRc4rG55BcC
