Same class of testbench-vs-DUT scheduling race documented in EXP-0058
(tb_layer_prefetch_ctrl.v, tb_neural_processor_layer_reuse.v) was also
present here on ctrl_req/fill_done/consume_done: clearing a one-cycle
pulse on the very next @(posedge clk) let the clear land in the same
active-region pass as the edge the DUT needed to sample it at, so the
pulse could be silently missed. Confirmed via direct state tracing:
sdram_controller_openrow.v sat in S_IDLE with busy=0 forever after the
first burst, never latching req_pending for the second -- this is why
the file hung indefinitely rather than completing. Fixed with the same
#1-before-clear hardening as the other files.
Honesty note: fixing this hang exposed a SECOND, still-unfixed bug in
prefetch_layer's own fill_addr sequencing (real data-correctness
failures once the run actually completes, not just a hang) -- so
EXP-0057's own headline "7.16x real measured speedup" number is NOT
re-verified by this commit and should not be treated as confirmed. Not
pursued further -- see decisions.log for why (project paused).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MUG92aM9m68TRc4rG55BcC