micheleandClaude Sonnet 5
03b5cbc25b
Follow-up to EXP-0051: built sdram_controller_pipelined.v, remapping addr->bank to low-order bits (today's weight region always maps to bank 0) and adding a shadow-slot ACTIVATE lookahead so a different-bank request can start its tRCD wait during the current transaction's tail. Phase A (isolated tb_sdram_controller_pipelined.v, 38/38 bit-exact, independently re-verified this session): mechanism works, saves exactly 2 cycles (tRCD) per different-bank back-to-back pair, matching the theoretical ceiling derived before measuring (CAS_LATENCY+BURST_LEN are serial on the shared data bus regardless of bank, so more than tRCD/tRP was never on the table). Phase B (integration, tb_nms_dstress_sdram_pipelined.v, independently rebuilt/rerun): N=4 49760 cycles (-0.33% vs baseline), N=8 49755 (-0.31%) -- both 256/256 bit-exact. Root cause of the gap: the W port's request/ready protocol is one-at-a-time, so a second, different-bank request is essentially never already pending while the first is still in flight, so the mechanism rarely triggers in the real system even though it's correct when directly stimulated. Not integrated into production; kept as additive reference for a possible future arbiter/backend pipelined-dispatch rewrite (out of scope here, larger and riskier). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YHENedK76onD2Vtc2CMjej