Layer chain / ping-pong / busy-done certified via the existing
pre-session test, which already verifies the actual ping-pong buffer
address used (not just the value) and correct busy/done timing.
New finding, BUG-005 (CRITICAL): run_num_layers=0 has no guard at
compile time or runtime, and unlike BUG-002's 1-bit group_index (which
can never represent the wraparound value), layer_idx here is a full
8-bit register that naturally reaches it. Confirmed empirically with a
minimal neuron_memory stub: RUN_NETWORK(0) runs through all 256
possible layer indices (21761 cycles), reading arbitrary PSRAM bytes
far past the real descriptor table as if they were valid layer
descriptors, running real neuron_memory passes on them, and writing
results to ping-pong buffer addresses derived from that arbitrary
data. More severe than BUG-002/003/004: reachable via a single
documented SPI opcode (RUN_NETWORK), real PSRAM corruption risk rather
than just a hang or wrong result. Root cause fully isolated, not just
the symptom.
Full regression: 40/40 real tests pass, 1 new observational test
(no pass/fail by design) deterministically reproduces BUG-005.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013xXuuRUWZScuo1DeYJxs3v
Priority B>C>A>D confirmed correct with distinguishable per-port data
(not just "someone got served" but "the right requester got its own
data back") across 4 contention scenarios. D-alone case confirms low
priority does not mean never granted.
Found and fixed a real race in the test harness itself: blocking
assignments withdrew loser requests in the same clock edge meant to
grant the winner, racing the DUT's own synchronous block -- dut.owner
never left SEL_NONE, every wait() blocked forever. Fixed by switching
request-signal drives to non-blocking assignments throughout.
Documented (not filed as a bug) that D can starve indefinitely under
sustained continuous B contention -- standard behavior for a
fixed-priority arbiter with no aging, and explicitly outside the
header's own stated operating assumption (B/C temporally disjoint in
normal operation). Flagged the header's "never starves or corrupts
A/B/C" wording as ambiguous about whether it promises D's own
progress.
Full regression: 40/40 real tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013xXuuRUWZScuo1DeYJxs3v
int8_memory_access.v byte<->word conversion and byte-lane selection:
exhaustive 2048-address test + 6 real read/write round-trips through
the FSM handshake. 2054/2054 checks, 0 mismatches, after fixing two
bugs in the test harness itself (a same-timestep race reading a
non-blocking update one iteration late, and a behavioral memory stub
that ignored byte-lane enables on write) -- both documented as
test-side, not RTL, issues.
memory_interface.v and psram_controller.v not re-verified from
scratch: cited against coverage already established/re-confirmed
earlier in this same session (page-mode/tCEM against the ISSI
datasheet, a real pre-existing power-up request-loss bug found and
fixed), re-run clean via the Phase 0 regression harness rather than
trusted from WORKLOG text alone.
Full regression: 39/39 real tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013xXuuRUWZScuo1DeYJxs3v
n_inputs_real/n_neurons_real early termination for valid values is
certified real: a "poison" region (data that would saturate the result
if read past the claimed limit) confirms no over-read, cycle counts
scale proportionally. n_inputs_real non-multiple-of-PARALLEL at runtime
matches the documented silent-truncation risk exactly.
n_inputs_real=0 / n_neurons_real=0 (BUG-003/004): confirmed incorrect
behavior in every repetition, but the exact triggering mechanism was
NOT fully isolated -- nearly-identical repeated tests produced
different symptoms (clean hang vs. silently processing the full build
width vs. a third cycle count matching neither). Reported in full,
including the inconsistency itself, rather than picking the cleanest
result. The two new permanent testbenches reflect this honestly: the
solid early-termination checks are hard assertions, the n_*_real=0
probe is deliberately observe-only given the non-deterministic result.
Full regression: 38/38 real tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013xXuuRUWZScuo1DeYJxs3v
mac_unit.v: exhaustive unit test (all 65536 (x,w) combinations at
DATA_WIDTH=8, plus 486 boundary acc_in vectors) against an independent
Python oracle (tools/validation/mac_oracle.py). 66022/66022 match, 0
reserves.
mac8.v: first-ever dedicated unit test (previously only indirect
coverage at whatever single PARALLEL neuron_parallel_tb.v happens to
use). Verified at PARALLEL=2/8/32 with structural adversarial vectors
(catches swapped/duplicated tree wiring), 300 random INT8 pairs per
PARALLEL with realistic accumulating acc_in, and worst-case magnitude
adversarial vectors. 939/939 match.
Confirms BUG-002 (N_INPUTS=0 bypasses the N_INPUTS%PARALLEL elaboration
guard) is real, on both simulation and real Yosys synthesis -- root
cause: [DATA_WIDTH*N_INPUTS-1:0] becomes [-1:0] for N_INPUTS=0, which
both tools treat as a genuine 2-bit undriven vector rather than
collapsing to zero width. Includes a documented self-correction: the
first verification attempt produced a false "hang" using an invalid
one-shot late check of a single-cycle done pulse -- caught by
reproducing the same false result on a known-good sanity config before
trusting it.
Full regression re-run clean after adding 3 new testbenches: 36/36 real
tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013xXuuRUWZScuo1DeYJxs3v
Builds tools/run_regression.py (no reproducible regression script existed
before -- every prior "N testbenches, all pass" claim was assembled by
hand). Resolves each testbench's dependencies by static analysis of
instantiation sites, not from memory, then compiles+runs everything fresh.
Independently re-verifies the 33-testbench regression clean (0 real
failures) after fixing two false negatives in the harness itself (two
tests are deliberate compile-time-failure negative tests, one file is a
benchmark with no pass/fail verdict by design -- confirmed by reading
each file's own header, not assumed).
Findings recorded in docs/validation/: sim/top.v is dead code (references
a removed FRAC_BITS parameter from the pre-INT8 Q8.8 era); mac_unit.v/
mac8.v have no dedicated unit testbench, only indirect coverage; the
N_INPUTS%PARALLEL elaboration guard does not mathematically cover
N_INPUTS=0 (open finding, not yet confirmed reachable -- BUG-002).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013xXuuRUWZScuo1DeYJxs3v
micheleandClaude Sonnet 5