abaaf21f56a4f18533cee8ee28a742aa3bea4d21
3
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  micheleandClaude Sonnet 5
|
63cac6a7e5 |
perf(v2): shared activation cache - further 1.66-2.00x real speedup (DEC-0016)
Implements optimization #2 from the final benchmark campaign's own recommendation, on top of DEC-0015's word-level burst rewrite: a new shared activation_cache.v module fetches a given activation (X) vector from PSRAM once instead of once per neuron sharing it - the exact redundant traffic pattern the dense-layer workloads in this project's benchmark suite exhibit. Each memory_manager's own prefetch_engine now fetches WEIGHTS only; the activation half is requested from the shared cache instead (single-tag, tile-granular, N_SLOTS request ports, its own real word-level PSRAM backend via a new dedicated arbiter port). dataflow_core.v/slot_mem_arbiter.v/neural_multiprocessor.v widened to N_SLOTS+1 ports to arbitrate the cache's traffic alongside each slot's weight traffic. Two real bugs found and fixed during implementation (ERR-0010): a target-bank/pending-bank race in memory_manager.v's activation-cache wiring (the same bug class ERR-0006 already fixed once for pf_target_bank - a later handoff's queued request can overwrite which bank an earlier, still-in-flight request's ack applies to), and a repeat of ERR-0009's N_SLOTS=1 zero-width replication bug in activation_cache.v itself. Real, measured results: the full final-benchmark campaign (24/24 workload/config combinations) re-verified bit-exact. D-Stress cycles fall a further 1.66-2.00x on top of DEC-0015 (~4x combined vs the original byte-level baseline). But the cache's real Fmax cost is much steeper than DEC-0015's own: N_SLOTS=2 (the recommended default, DEC-0014) drops from 133.58 to 87.72 MHz (-34%, margin over 80MHz shrinks from +67% to +9.7%), and N_SLOTS=4 drops to 65.01 MHz - now FAILING the 80MHz target it previously passed. Combined real wall-clock speedup vs the original baseline: N=1 3.86x, N=2 2.45x (both real net wins); N=4 is a real regression once its own now-failing Fmax is honestly used, though N=4 was never the recommended configuration. N_SLOTS=2 remains the recommended default (DEC-0014 unaffected) with a thinner but still real Fmax margin. Cache hit-detection pipelining is flagged as concrete follow-up work if N_SLOTS>2 is ever needed with the cache active - not attempted this round. Logged: simulation/synthesis/timing/benchmark/decisions (DEC-0016)/ experiments (EXP-0016)/errors (ERR-0010)/development.log, ROADMAP.md updated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013xXuuRUWZScuo1DeYJxs3v |
||
|
micheleandClaude Sonnet 5
|
e4a5540b6e |
perf(v2): word-level burst reads - 2.24-2.37x real wall-clock speedup (DEC-0015)
Implements optimization #1 from the final benchmark campaign's own recommendation: exploit psram_controller.v's already-implemented page-mode support (confirmed present by direct inspection) by fetching multiple bytes per real backend transaction instead of one at a time. Root cause addressed: int8_memory_access.v (the byte-level backend prefetch_engine.v originally sat on) already converts every 8-bit logical request into a full 16-bit PSRAM word access internally (mem_addr <= addr >> 1), discarding half of every word it already paid for. prefetch_engine.v/memory_manager.v now speak memory_interface.v's own 16-bit word protocol directly, bypassing int8_memory_access.v entirely - which remains untouched, still frozen V1 (§1/§34); V2 simply reuses the lower layer of the same frozen chain instead of the byte-splitting layer on top of it, the same "reuse what fits" precedent slot_mem_arbiter.v already set. slot_mem_arbiter.v and neural_multiprocessor.v widened to match (lb_n/ub_n added, master port wired directly to memory_interface.v). Real, measured results: M4's own single-job testbench shows 49-56% fewer cycles (166->84, 446->204, 728->322, all still bit-exact). The full final-benchmark campaign (24/24 workload/config combinations) re-verified bit-exact with D-Stress's real wall-clock time (cycles / real POST-P&R Fmax) improving 2.24-2.37x across every N_SLOTS tested, against a small real Fmax cost (unchanged at N=1, -6.2% at N=2, -1.2% at N=4). tb_neural_multiprocessor.v (M8) and tb_benchmark_suite.v (final campaign) needed zero changes - both treat neural_multiprocessor.v as a black box. Only tb_memory_manager.v (M4, rewired to skip int8_memory_access.v) and tb_dataflow_core.v (M7, behavioral model widened to word-level) needed updates. The "real parallel scaling is flat beyond N_SLOTS=2" finding (DEC-0014) still holds - this optimization made the shared PSRAM port more efficient per transaction, not multi-ported - so N_SLOTS=2 remains the recommended default. Logged: simulation/synthesis/timing/benchmark/decisions (DEC-0015)/ experiments (EXP-0015)/development.log. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013xXuuRUWZScuo1DeYJxs3v |
||
|
micheleandClaude Sonnet 5
|
6cff2c8a7c |
feat(v2): M8 PSRAM integration - real V1 backend shared across concurrent slots
neural_multiprocessor.v wraps dataflow_core.v (M7, unmodified) around the real, unmodified V1 PSRAM backend chain (int8_memory_access -> memory_interface -> psram_controller), funneling N_SLOTS independent Memory Backend Interface ports through a new generic N-port arbiter (slot_mem_arbiter.v) inspired by (not copied from) V1's own mem_arbiter.v. Real concurrent-slot simulation immediately surfaced a genuine bug (ERR-0008): memory_manager/prefetch_engine's byte-level backend protocol is fire-and-forget (a single-cycle mem_req pulse with no accept handshake) - correct for M4's direct 1:1 connection, but a naive arbiter silently drops a pulse arriving while the shared bus is owned by another slot, hanging that slot forever. Fixed with a per-port pending-request latch, the same "queue, don't drop" idiom already used by memory_manager's own pf_pending register (ERR-0006). Verified (Verilator): 4/4 PASS with 2 slots genuinely contending for one real PSRAM port (444 cycles). No regression on M4's own testbench. Real synthesis + nextpnr-ecp5 P&R (no harness needed - real PSRAM pins keep the top-level at 157 pins): 0 problems, Fmax 142.45 MHz, PASS at 80MHz. Arbitration policy is fixed lowest-index priority, not fairness- balanced (DEC-0010) - consistent with every other "simplest correct policy first" scheduling choice in this roadmap, revisited only if M9's real measurement shows starvation matters. Logged: simulation/synthesis/timing/benchmark/decisions (DEC-0010)/ experiments (EXP-0009)/errors (ERR-0008)/development.log, ROADMAP.md updated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013xXuuRUWZScuo1DeYJxs3v |