Priority B>C>A>D confirmed correct with distinguishable per-port data
(not just "someone got served" but "the right requester got its own
data back") across 4 contention scenarios. D-alone case confirms low
priority does not mean never granted.
Found and fixed a real race in the test harness itself: blocking
assignments withdrew loser requests in the same clock edge meant to
grant the winner, racing the DUT's own synchronous block -- dut.owner
never left SEL_NONE, every wait() blocked forever. Fixed by switching
request-signal drives to non-blocking assignments throughout.
Documented (not filed as a bug) that D can starve indefinitely under
sustained continuous B contention -- standard behavior for a
fixed-priority arbiter with no aging, and explicitly outside the
header's own stated operating assumption (B/C temporally disjoint in
normal operation). Flagged the header's "never starves or corrupts
A/B/C" wording as ambiguous about whether it promises D's own
progress.
Full regression: 40/40 real tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013xXuuRUWZScuo1DeYJxs3v
