Pins 1/2 and 3/4 were each defined at the exact same coordinates, so
the schematic showed a single stub per side instead of 4 distinct
pins. Spread them onto vertical buses per node (1-2 common, 3-4
common) while keeping the switch contact graphics unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TnzoFuRZAhRGeHAdz8UzR2
Import SnapEDA-sourced symbols/footprints/3D models for a handful of
power and LED parts. Also corrects the TS3425UA-3x4x2.5-160 tactile
switch: courtyard was undersized (used the simplified 4.2x3.4mm
headline package size instead of the full 5.2x3.35mm mechanical
envelope), datasheet/sourcing metadata was empty, and no 3D model was
present -- now verified against the official SHOUHAN/CAX mechanical
drawing and LCSC C51927439, with a real STEP body added.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GjmdnB2SyPYKHbSq9Lasmr
Symbol + footprint reconstructed from manvalan/DigiRadio's EasyEDA
project (same method as the FSC-BT1035 footprint), cross-checked
against the manufacturer datasheet found in that same project. The
datasheet's own circuit diagram shows two independent, mechanically
-ganged contact pairs (not a simple SPST), reproduced faithfully in
the symbol. Pin numbering preserved exactly as extracted, kept
internally consistent between symbol and footprint.
micheleandClaude Sonnet 5