Files
FPGA-Neural/hardware/v2/docs/architecture/activation_fabric_timing.md
T
micheleandClaude Sonnet 5 81a9619214 chore: remove root-level V1 duplicates, superseded by hardware/v1/ freeze
hardware/v1/ was created (dc0b331) as a frozen snapshot of the V1
project that then lived at the repo root (rtl/, sim/, synth/, tools/,
docs/). Root received zero further commits to those files after the
freeze -- confirmed byte-identical to the hardware/v1/ copy for every
file removed here. Root was the "before", hardware/v1/ is the
curated, canonical "after".

Removed (all verified exact-hash duplicates of hardware/v1/ content):
  - rtl/ (20 files, 100% covered by hardware/v1/rtl/)
  - tools/{netasm,pinout,run_regression.py,flash_catalog,validation,
    fpga_benchmark.py} (19 files, 100% covered by hardware/v1/tools/;
    tools/neural_sim/ kept -- unique, post-freeze, no counterpart)
  - sim/*.v (47 testbenches, 100% covered by hardware/v1/sim/; the
    ~38 remaining sim/ entries are compiled binaries and .vcd
    waveform dumps, left as a separate cleanup decision)
  - synth/ecp5/{p2,p4,p8,post_fix_verify} (25 files, exact duplicates
    of hardware/v1/synthesis/; the other ~84 synth/ecp5/* experiment
    build directories are historical artifacts never carried into the
    freeze, left as a separate decision)
  - WORKLOG.md (duplicate of hardware/v1/docs/WORKLOG.md)
  - docs/{FPGA-Neural-Datapatch-Benchmark,FPGA-Neural-Hardware-Design,
    FPGA-NeuralNetwork-Engine}.md, docs/validation/*.md (18 files),
    docs/FPGA-Neural-Datasheet-{EN,IT}.pdf -- all exact duplicates of
    hardware/v1/docs/ content
  - hardware/v1/docs/DatasheetLatex/ (24 files) -- exact duplicate of
    hardware/v2/docs/datasheet/files/docs/datasheet/en/ (discovered
    during this audit; not the same DatasheetLatex already removed
    from hardware/v2/docs/ in an earlier commit)

Moved (genuine, unique, post-freeze V2 content -- not duplicated
anywhere, just living in the wrong/legacy root docs/ location):
  - docs/architecture/*.md -> hardware/v2/docs/architecture/
  - docs/pinouts.md, docs/FPGA_NEURAL_V2_DATASHEET.md,
    docs/FPGA_NEURAL_V2_SCHEMATIC.md,
    docs/FPGA-Neural-V2-Datasheet-EN.pdf -> hardware/v2/docs/

Left untouched (separate decisions, not part of this cleanup):
  - docs/FPGA-Neural-Flash-Subsystem-Verification.md, docs/
    v2-description.md -- orphaned root-only content, no duplicate
    found anywhere, but also not part of the reviewed plan
  - synth/ecp5/* experiment dirs and sim/*_sim + sim/*.vcd build
    artifacts -- not literal duplicates, flagged as candidates for a
    future, separate cleanup pass

Verified no functional breakage: grepped all remaining scripts/docs
for references to every removed path -- only prose/comment mentions
found, no executable imports or build-script paths broken.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013xXuuRUWZScuo1DeYJxs3v
2026-09-07 05:30:17 +02:00

4.3 KiB

NMS Activation Fill Controller Timing (STEP14 Part B)

Status: fixed, real post-P&R verified, bit-exact, adopted. Full data: hardware/v2/reports/step14_activation_timing.csv. Full narrative: hardware/v2/logs/experiments.log (EXP-0029, 0030, 0031), decisions.log (DEC-0026, DEC-0027).

B1 — Exact critical path (not assumed)

Mined directly from the real nextpnr-ecp5 P&R report for nms_neural_multiprocessor_stream.v at N_SLOTS=4 (Fmax=55.22 MHz, FAIL @ 80 MHz). Full path, 18.11 ns total (6.25 ns logic + 11.85 ns routing):

SOURCE:  u_act_fill.resident_tag[11]  (register Q)
   -> COMBINATIONAL, chained, NO register in between:
      (1) max_n_tiles computation, nms_activation_fill_ctrl.v:92
          (N_SLOTS-wide running-max fold, each iteration gated by a
          23-bit tag-equality check) -- long CCU2C carry chain
      (2) resident_count < max_n_tiles comparison, line 165
          (the ST_IDLE refill/continue decision) -- ANOTHER 16-bit
          magnitude-comparison carry chain, feeding directly off (1)
          in the SAME cycle
      (3) into pf_start's own next-state logic
DESTINATION: u_act_fill.pf_addr's clock-enable (CE) pin

Two full 16-bit magnitude comparisons sit in one combinational cone across one clock edge. This confirms, at the exact RTL-line level, the failure class DEC-0016/EXP-0022 predicted analytically ("O(N_SLOTS) unpipelined combinational scan feeding directly into a control decision") — but precisely localizes it to the comparison logic (lines 92 and 165), not the priority-encoder (desired_valid/desired_x_base, lines 77-86), which does not appear in this critical path at all.

B2 — Scaling behavior

The bottleneck is the max_n_tiles running-max fold: an imperative for loop creates a data dependency between iterations (max_n_tiles after iteration i depends on iteration i-1), which Yosys synthesizes as a sequentially-chained carry structure — inherently O(N_SLOTS) deep, not O(log N_SLOTS). At N_SLOTS=4 the chain reached 6.25 ns logic + 11.85 ns routing; at N_SLOTS=8 it doubles again (see below).

B3 — Minimum fix (two iterations, evidence-driven)

v2 (one pipeline stage: register max_n_tiles before its use in the resident_count comparison): Fmax 55.22 → 72.78 MHz (+31.8%) — real improvement, still fails 80 MHz. Re-tracing showed the remaining critical path was entirely inside max_n_tiles's own computation (now feeding its own register), confirming the fix needed to go one level deeper.

v3 (second stage: register each slot's tag-equality/masking result first — independent per-slot work, no N_SLOTS-dependent chain — then fold the already-registered, already-masked values): Fmax 55.22 → 106.81 MHz (+93.4%). PASSES 80 MHz with real margin. Resource cost: LUT4 -5.5%, FF +1.4% (2 added pipeline registers), CCU2C unchanged.

B4 — No serialization reintroduced

Verified directly: N_SLOTS=2 bit-exact regression test (D-Stress, real V1 PSRAM chain) gives numerically identical cycle count and sustained MAC/cycle before and after the fix (185270/185270 cycles, 0.1769/0.1769 MAC/cycle). The 3 total cycles of added latency apply only to the rare, tile-refill-boundary-only decision — never to the real-time per-tile consumption path (already fully decoupled by STEP13's own streaming manager). Higher Fmax, zero throughput cost — satisfying B4's explicit requirement.

N=8 (exploratory)

nms_activation_fill_ctrl_v3.v at N_SLOTS=8: DSP=64/72 (89%, FEASIBLE), LUT4=4653, FF=10855 (both comfortably FEASIBLE). Fmax=52.25 MHz, FAILS 80 MHz — the v3 fix's second stage (the max-fold itself) is still O(N_SLOTS)-deep; at N=8 it is twice as deep as at N=4 and becomes dominant again. This is expected: v3 shifted the crossover point, it did not eliminate the underlying dependency. A genuine balanced-tree reduction (or a pipeline scaling with log₂(N_SLOTS) rather than a flat 2-stage split) would be required for N=8 — not undertaken this round (N=8 is explicitly exploratory; the limiting resource (Fmax, not DSP/LUT/FF/BRAM) is precisely identified and quantified, per spec).

Adoption

nms_activation_fill_ctrl_v3.v is adopted as the reference activation fill controller for N_SLOTS≥4 configurations (DEC-0027). The original and the insufficient v2 are preserved for reference.