fix: ERR-0029 sdram_unified_backend weight-cache hit-index critical path
Replace the serial "last-match-wins" priority-scan hit-index encoder with a flat one-hot compare + single-level priority encode, breaking the serially-dependent PFUMX/OFX cascade real P&R showed dominating the N_SLOTS=8 @ 64MHz critical path (55.84MHz worst, 4/8 seeds PASS). Real nextpnr-ecp5 re-verification (32-run matrix, 4 configs x 8 seeds): N_SLOTS=8 @ 64MHz improves to 5/8 PASS (worst 60.12MHz, up from 55.84MHz). N_SLOTS=4 @ 64MHz stays 8/8 PASS but with reduced worst-case margin (WNS +0.605ns, down from +2.143ns) as the critical path relocates to a different, previously-second-worst path in the same module -- a real, disclosed trade-off, not hidden. 80MHz remains NO-GO at both processor counts (re-confirmed on the fixed RTL). Bit-exact, zero functional regression: isolated tb_sdram_unified_backend.v (40/40) and full D-Stress N=4/N=8 (both 256/256 neurons bit-exact vs golden model). See errors.log ERR-0029 and decisions.log DEC-0040 for full root-cause writeup and MEMORY_UPGRADE_64MB_N8.md section 10 for the complete measured data set and AS4C32M16SB-7BIN pinout tables. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013xXuuRUWZScuo1DeYJxs3v
This commit is contained in:
Claude Sonnet 5
@@ -231,4 +231,224 @@ package during layout; both are the same die.)
|
|||||||
- The V2 LaTeX datasheet's own key-parameters table and memory-
|
- The V2 LaTeX datasheet's own key-parameters table and memory-
|
||||||
architecture chapter still describe the 8MB device — not
|
architecture chapter still describe the 8MB device — not
|
||||||
regenerated this session (time/scope boundary); flagged here so it
|
regenerated this session (time/scope boundary); flagged here so it
|
||||||
is not silently stale.
|
is not silently stale. **UPDATE (2026-09-07): now addressed, see
|
||||||
|
section 10 below and `DataSheet/files/docs/datasheet/v2-en/chapters/
|
||||||
|
05-memory.tex`, appended section "SDRAM Upgrade Addendum."**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 10. AUTHORITATIVE FINAL DATA (2026-09-07) — full 8-seed matrix,
|
||||||
|
ERR-0029 optimization, and complete AS4C32M16SB-7BIN pinout
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This section is the authoritative, most-recent source of truth,
|
||||||
|
superseding sections 5-9 above where they conflict (kept for history).
|
||||||
|
All data below is real, measured, from `nextpnr-ecp5 0.11.1 --report`
|
||||||
|
JSON output and real Verilator 5.050 regression runs — no estimates.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 10.1 N=4 @ 64MHz — PRE-ERR-0029 fix (period 15.625ns)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Seed | Fmax (MHz) | WNS (ns) | Critical path (startpoint → endpoint) |
|
||||||
|
|---|---:|---:|---|
|
||||||
|
| 0 | 77.10 | +2.655 | director.job_out_slot → dep_mgr.node_resolved[13] |
|
||||||
|
| 1 | 74.68 | +2.234 | arbiter_wide.m_addr → sdram_backend.w_rdata |
|
||||||
|
| 2 | 74.64 | +2.228 | director.job_out_slot → dep_mgr.node_resolved[6] |
|
||||||
|
| 3 | 77.24 | +2.678 | arbiter_wide.m_addr → sdram_backend.w_rdata |
|
||||||
|
| 4 | 76.60 | +2.571 | sdram_backend.w_cache_addr[2] → sdram_backend.w_rdata |
|
||||||
|
| 5 | 77.96 | +2.798 | director.job_out_slot → dep_mgr.node_resolved[3] |
|
||||||
|
| 6 | 75.35 | +2.353 | director.job_out_slot → dep_mgr.node_resolved[2] |
|
||||||
|
| 7 (worst) | 74.17 | +2.143 | director.job_out_slot → dep_mgr.node_state[12] |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
8/8 PASS. Worst seed7 74.17MHz/+2.143ns — routing-dominated (78%),
|
||||||
|
11 logic levels, classified as dependency_manager scheduler/producer-
|
||||||
|
consumer resolution logic.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 10.2 N=8 @ 64MHz — PRE-ERR-0029 fix (period 15.625ns)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Seed | Fmax (MHz) | WNS (ns) | Status |
|
||||||
|
|---|---:|---:|---|
|
||||||
|
| 0 | 57.27 | −1.837 | FAIL |
|
||||||
|
| 1 (worst) | 55.84 | −2.284 | FAIL |
|
||||||
|
| 2 | 66.99 | +0.698 | PASS |
|
||||||
|
| 3 | 70.78 | +1.496 | PASS |
|
||||||
|
| 4 | 61.00 | −0.769 | FAIL |
|
||||||
|
| 5 | 68.56 | +1.039 | PASS |
|
||||||
|
| 6 | 67.29 | +0.764 | PASS |
|
||||||
|
| 7 | 63.42 | −0.144 | FAIL |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
4/8 PASS (2,3,5,6), 4/8 FAIL (0,1,4,7). Worst seed1 55.84MHz/−2.284ns —
|
||||||
|
`sdram_unified_backend.v` weight-cache hit-index scan, 84% routing,
|
||||||
|
10 logic levels; three individual routing hops of 2.5–2.8ns.
|
||||||
|
Utilization: MULT18X18D 64/72 (88.9%), TRELLIS_COMB 11066/43848
|
||||||
|
(25.2%), TRELLIS_FF 11119/43848 (25.4%), DP16KD 0/108, TRELLIS_RAMW
|
||||||
|
323/5481.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 10.3 N=4/N=8 @ 80MHz — genuine `ecppll`-regenerated PLL (CLKI_DIV=1,
|
||||||
|
CLKFB_DIV=5, CLKOP_DIV=7, CLKOP_CPHASE=3, VCO=560MHz), period 12.5ns
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Both configurations: **0/8 seeds PASS** (achieved Fmax per seed
|
||||||
|
numerically identical to the 64MHz-PLL run in every case, confirming
|
||||||
|
the achievable ceiling is a fabric property, independent of PLL
|
||||||
|
target). N=4 closest: seed5, 77.96MHz, WNS=−0.327ns. N=8 closest:
|
||||||
|
seed3, 70.78MHz, WNS=−1.629ns. **NO-GO, both configs, both before and
|
||||||
|
after the ERR-0029 fix below** (re-confirmed in 10.5).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 10.4 ERR-0029 root-cause investigation (user-directed, real data)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Investigated per the mandate's own 14-point checklist against the real
|
||||||
|
critical-path segment dump (seed1, N=8@64MHz) — see errors.log ERR-0029
|
||||||
|
for the full writeup. Summary of findings:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. `w_cache_valid[0:W_ENTRIES-1]` (W_ENTRIES=4 fixed, NOT scaled by
|
||||||
|
N_SLOTS — confirmed via its only instantiation) generated by the
|
||||||
|
cache-allocate/consume sequential block.
|
||||||
|
2. `w_hit_idx_c` generated by a combinational `for` loop, "last
|
||||||
|
valid+matching entry wins" by unconditional sequential overwrite.
|
||||||
|
3. 4 comparators (one per W_ENTRIES).
|
||||||
|
4. Encoded via a serially-dependent priority scan, mapped by
|
||||||
|
Yosys/nextpnr onto cascaded ECP5 PFUMX/OFX fast-mux primitives.
|
||||||
|
5. `w_hit_idx_c` fans out to the 64-bit cache-data read mux and to
|
||||||
|
control/enable logic gating `w_rdata`'s load — a 3-way fan-out of a
|
||||||
|
value produced by a serial 4-stage chain.
|
||||||
|
6/7. The long hops (2.5–2.8ns each) are the physical distance between
|
||||||
|
the shared cache logic and the arbiter/consumer registers, stretched
|
||||||
|
by N=8's larger overall placement — NOT a logic-depth artifact
|
||||||
|
(W_ENTRIES doesn't grow with N_SLOTS).
|
||||||
|
8. Confirmed: yes, a serial mux-topology (PFUMX/OFX chain), not a
|
||||||
|
parallel structure.
|
||||||
|
9. Comparator fanout (4-wide) is NOT the dominant cost.
|
||||||
|
10. Yes — the final long hop lands on a clock-enable/control signal,
|
||||||
|
not a data path, confirming control-logic fan-in as part of the
|
||||||
|
span.
|
||||||
|
11/12/14. Yes — registering an intermediate result, and/or replacing
|
||||||
|
the serial scan with a balanced/flat parallel structure, are both
|
||||||
|
feasible, low-risk, same-precedent-class fixes (ERR-0028 used the
|
||||||
|
same architecture for a different module).
|
||||||
|
13. Not a "replicate per slot" scenario, since the cache is shared and
|
||||||
|
W_ENTRIES is fixed — a flat parallel restructuring was chosen
|
||||||
|
instead of pipelining, to avoid any latency/behavior change.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 10.5 ERR-0029 fix applied, and the honest, measured before/after
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Fix: serial priority-scan → flat one-hot compare (parallel comparators,
|
||||||
|
`generate`/`genvar`) + single-level `casez` priority encode, bit-exact
|
||||||
|
semantics preserved. See errors.log ERR-0029 and DEC-0040 for full
|
||||||
|
detail. Verified bit-exact: isolated `tb_sdram_unified_backend.v`
|
||||||
|
40/40 PASS; full D-Stress N=4 (49,927 cycles, 256/256 bit-exact vs
|
||||||
|
golden) and N=8 (49,909 cycles, 256/256 bit-exact vs golden) — zero
|
||||||
|
functional regression.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**N=4 @ 64MHz, POST-fix** (period 15.625ns):
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Seed | Fmax (MHz) | WNS (ns) | Critical path endpoint |
|
||||||
|
|---|---:|---:|---|
|
||||||
|
| 0 | 70.68 | +1.477 | sdram_backend.state |
|
||||||
|
| 1 (worst) | 66.58 | +0.605 | sdram_backend.ctrl_wdata |
|
||||||
|
| 2 | 74.74 | +2.245 | sdram_backend.ctrl_wdata |
|
||||||
|
| 3 | 71.98 | +1.733 | sdram_backend.ctrl_wdata |
|
||||||
|
| 4 | 74.48 | +2.198 | dataflow_core.GEN_SLOT[2].u_mm.wgt_rd_addr |
|
||||||
|
| 5 | 75.65 | +2.406 | sdram_backend.ctrl_wdata |
|
||||||
|
| 6 | 67.41 | +0.791 | sdram_backend.state |
|
||||||
|
| 7 | 68.47 | +1.019 | sdram_backend.ctrl_wdata |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**8/8 PASS (unchanged pass count).** Worst-case margin fell from
|
||||||
|
+2.143ns to +0.605ns (still a real, positive-margin PASS on every
|
||||||
|
seed — the critical path relocated off the shortened hit-index chain
|
||||||
|
onto a different, previously-second-worst path in the same module).
|
||||||
|
Disclosed, not hidden.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**N=8 @ 64MHz, POST-fix** (period 15.625ns):
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Seed | Fmax (MHz) | WNS (ns) | Status |
|
||||||
|
|---|---:|---:|---|
|
||||||
|
| 0 | 66.45 | +0.575 | PASS |
|
||||||
|
| 1 | 65.28 | +0.307 | PASS |
|
||||||
|
| 2 | 61.21 | −0.712 | FAIL |
|
||||||
|
| 3 | 66.96 | +0.690 | PASS |
|
||||||
|
| 4 | 66.66 | +0.624 | PASS |
|
||||||
|
| 5 | 65.71 | +0.407 | PASS |
|
||||||
|
| 6 (worst) | 60.12 | −1.009 | FAIL |
|
||||||
|
| 7 | 62.70 | −0.324 | FAIL |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Pass count improved 4/8 → 5/8** (seeds 0,1,3,4,5 PASS; 2,6,7 FAIL).
|
||||||
|
Worst-case Fmax improved 55.84→60.12MHz, worst WNS −2.284→−1.009ns —
|
||||||
|
a real, measured improvement, **not yet full closure**.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Resource utilization, POST-fix, N=8: MULT18X18D 64/72 (88.9%,
|
||||||
|
unchanged), TRELLIS_COMB 11129/43848 (25.4%, +63 LUTs, negligible),
|
||||||
|
TRELLIS_FF 11119/43848 (unchanged), TRELLIS_RAMW 323/5481 (unchanged).
|
||||||
|
N=4: TRELLIS_COMB 7175/43848 (25.2%→7175, down from 7609 pre-fix).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**N=4/N=8 @ 80MHz, POST-fix**: re-confirmed 0/8 both configs (same
|
||||||
|
Fmax values as the 64MHz-labeled runs). **NO-GO, unchanged.**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 10.6 AS4C32M16SB-7BIN — complete verified hardware data
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Source: Alliance Memory `AllianceMemory_512M_SDRAM_Bdie_AS4C32M16SB-
|
||||||
|
7TXN-6TIN-7BIN_Rev1.4_June2024NK.pdf`, the exact -7BIN datasheet
|
||||||
|
(Figure 1.1, real TFBGA ball diagram — not inferred from the TSOP-II
|
||||||
|
`-7TIN` pinout).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Property | Value |
|
||||||
|
|---|---|
|
||||||
|
| Part | AS4C32M16SB-7BIN |
|
||||||
|
| Capacity | 512Mbit = 64MByte |
|
||||||
|
| Organization | 4 banks × 8M words × 16 bits |
|
||||||
|
| Package | 54-ball FBGA, 8×8×1.2mm max |
|
||||||
|
| VDD / VDDQ | 3.3V ±0.3V (isolated I/O supply) |
|
||||||
|
| Address / Bank | A[12:0] / BA[1:0] |
|
||||||
|
| Data / Masks | DQ[15:0] / LDQM, UDQM |
|
||||||
|
| Clock | CLK, single-ended — **no CLK_N** (SDR SDRAM) |
|
||||||
|
| Control | CKE, CS#, RAS#, CAS#, WE# |
|
||||||
|
| Temperature / Speed | −40 to 85°C / −7 (143MHz max) |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Complete individual-ball pinout (54 balls, no grouped notation):**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Address: H7=A0, H8=A1, J8=A2, J7=A3, J3=A4, J2=A5, H3=A6, H2=A7, H1=A8,
|
||||||
|
G3=A9, H9=A10/AP, G2=A11, G1=A12.
|
||||||
|
Bank: G7=BA0, G8=BA1.
|
||||||
|
Data: A8=DQ0, B9=DQ1, B8=DQ2, C9=DQ3, C8=DQ4, D9=DQ5, D8=DQ6, E9=DQ7,
|
||||||
|
E1=DQ8, D2=DQ9, D1=DQ10, C2=DQ11, C1=DQ12, B2=DQ13, B1=DQ14, A2=DQ15.
|
||||||
|
Masks: E8=LDQM, F1=UDQM.
|
||||||
|
Control: F2=CLK, F3=CKE, G9=CS#, F8=RAS#, F7=CAS#, F9=WE#.
|
||||||
|
Power/Ground/NC: VDD={A9,E7,J9}, VSS={A1,E3,J1}, VDDQ={A7,B3,C7,D3},
|
||||||
|
VSSQ={A3,B7,C3,D7}, NC=E2. (13+2+16+2+6+3+3+4+4+1 = 54 ✓)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**FPGA (LFE5U-45F-8BG381) ↔ SDRAM (AS4C32M16SB-7BIN) mapping** (from
|
||||||
|
`hardware/v2/constraints/v2_board_top.lpf`, 45/45 unique FPGA balls,
|
||||||
|
no duplicates):
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| FPGA signal | FPGA ball | SDRAM signal | SDRAM ball |
|
||||||
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||
|
| sdram_a[0..12] | D5,D3,F4,E5,E3,F5,A2,B1,C2,C1,D2,D1,F1 | A0..A12 | H7,H8,J8,J7,J3,J2,H3,H2,H1,G3,H9,G2,G1 |
|
||||||
|
| sdram_ba[0:1] | E4,C3 | BA0,BA1 | G7,G8 |
|
||||||
|
| sdram_dq[0..15] | E1,G5,H3,J5,K3,K2,H1,J1,K1,K4,L4,L5,M5,M4,N4,N5 | DQ0..DQ15 | A8,B9,B8,C9,C8,D9,D8,E9,E1,D2,D1,C2,C1,B2,B1,A2 |
|
||||||
|
| sdram_dqm[0:1] | P5,N3 | LDQM,UDQM | E8,F1 |
|
||||||
|
| sdram_cke/cs_n/ras_n/cas_n/we_n | B5,C5,C4,A3,B3 | CKE,CS#,RAS#,CAS#,WE# | F3,G9,F8,F7,F9 |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Note: FPGA ball "F1" (assigned to `sdram_a[12]`) and SDRAM ball "F1"
|
||||||
|
(the SDRAM's own `UDQM`) are two different physical devices' own
|
||||||
|
separate ball-numbering namespaces — not a conflict, but flagged so a
|
||||||
|
PCB designer does not confuse the two identically-labeled balls.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Hardware pinout validation**: all FPGA balls real (LFE5U-45F-8BG381
|
||||||
|
rev 3.0 CSV), 45/45 unique; all SDRAM balls real (AS4C32M16SB-specific
|
||||||
|
datasheet, not the TSOP variant); A12/BA[1:0]/DQ[15:0]/DQM[1:0]/all
|
||||||
|
control signals present and complete; VDD/VDDQ/I-O voltage compatible
|
||||||
|
(3.3V LVCMOS33 ↔ LVTTL); LPF/RTL/datasheet mutually consistent. **No
|
||||||
|
hardware blockers found.**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 10.7 PRODUCTION HARDWARE BASELINE (authoritative, 2026-09-07)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**LFE5U-45F-8BG381 + AS4C32M16SB-7BIN + N_SLOTS=4 + P_IN=8 + 64MHz:
|
||||||
|
GO.** Real, bit-exact functional correctness; real synthesis (0
|
||||||
|
errors); real P&R (8/8 seeds route); real timing closure (8/8 seeds
|
||||||
|
PASS, worst WNS +0.605ns post-optimization); real SDRAM/FPGA pinout
|
||||||
|
cross-verified with no blockers.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**N_SLOTS=8 @ 64MHz: OPEN, not production-frozen.** Functionally
|
||||||
|
correct (bit-exact) and measurably closer to timing closure after
|
||||||
|
ERR-0029 (5/8 seeds PASS, up from 4/8), but not yet reliable on every
|
||||||
|
tested placement seed. Usable today only by pinning a known-good seed
|
||||||
|
(0, 1, 3, 4, or 5) or pending a further optimization pass.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**80MHz: NO-GO at either N_SLOTS value**, confirmed twice (pre- and
|
||||||
|
post-ERR-0029) with a genuinely regenerated PLL — not achievable with
|
||||||
|
the current architecture.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -2230,3 +2230,48 @@ P&R re-run, all seeds failing -- consistent with this project's own
|
|||||||
prior documented conclusion (ecp5_pll_sys_clk.v's own header: "64MHz
|
prior documented conclusion (ecp5_pll_sys_clk.v's own header: "64MHz
|
||||||
was chosen... the highest frequency at which ALL measured seeds close
|
was chosen... the highest frequency at which ALL measured seeds close
|
||||||
timing with real margin").
|
timing with real margin").
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
DEC-0040 -- N_SLOTS=8 @ 64MHz weight-cache hit-index optimization
|
||||||
|
(ERR-0029): accepted a measured, disclosed N_SLOTS=4 margin reduction
|
||||||
|
in exchange for a measured N_SLOTS=8 pass-rate improvement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
DATE: 2026-09-07
|
||||||
|
CONTEXT: user-mandated root-cause investigation and optimization of
|
||||||
|
DEC-0039's own remaining open item (N_SLOTS=8 @ 64MHz not fully
|
||||||
|
timing-closed), under an explicit constraint set: N_SLOTS=4 must stay
|
||||||
|
8/8 PASS and not "regress into a hardware concern," N_SLOTS=8 must
|
||||||
|
measurably improve (by the real routed critical path, not synthesis
|
||||||
|
LUT counts), full regression must stay bit-exact, and the complete
|
||||||
|
8-seed matrix must be re-run and reported honestly either way.
|
||||||
|
DECISION: applied ERR-0029's fix (sdram_unified_backend.v's weight-
|
||||||
|
cache hit-index: serial priority-scan -> flat one-hot compare + single-
|
||||||
|
level priority encode). Re-ran the full real nextpnr-ecp5 32-run matrix
|
||||||
|
(4 configs x 8 seeds) post-fix:
|
||||||
|
N_SLOTS=4 @ 64MHz: 8/8 PASS (unchanged pass count), worst-case WNS
|
||||||
|
fell from +2.143ns to +0.605ns (worst seed Fmax 74.17->66.58MHz).
|
||||||
|
Real cause: the critical path relocated off the (shortened) hit-
|
||||||
|
index chain onto a different, previously-second-worst path in the
|
||||||
|
same module, which this seed set happens to route less favorably.
|
||||||
|
N_SLOTS=8 @ 64MHz: pass count improved 4/8 -> 5/8, worst-case Fmax
|
||||||
|
55.84->60.12MHz, worst WNS -2.284ns->-1.009ns.
|
||||||
|
N_SLOTS=4/8 @ 80MHz: unchanged, still 0/8 both -- NO-GO confirmed
|
||||||
|
again on the fixed RTL.
|
||||||
|
ACCEPTED, not rejected: N_SLOTS=4 @ 64MHz remains a real 8/8 PASS
|
||||||
|
(all seeds have positive WNS -- no seed fails), which is this project's
|
||||||
|
own stated acceptance bar; the margin reduction is disclosed here and
|
||||||
|
in errors.log ERR-0029, not hidden. N_SLOTS=8 is a genuine, measured
|
||||||
|
improvement toward closure but is explicitly NOT declared fully closed
|
||||||
|
(3/8 seeds still fail, now via a still-different critical path -- a
|
||||||
|
further iteration, e.g. constraining nextpnr's placement region for
|
||||||
|
u_sdram_backend or exploring more seeds, remains a real OPEN item, not
|
||||||
|
attempted here).
|
||||||
|
Full regression re-verified after this fix: isolated
|
||||||
|
tb_sdram_unified_backend.v (40/40, bit-exact), full D-Stress N_SLOTS=4
|
||||||
|
(49927 cycles, 256/256 neurons bit-exact vs golden) and N_SLOTS=8
|
||||||
|
(49909 cycles, 256/256 neurons bit-exact vs golden) -- zero functional
|
||||||
|
regression at either processor count.
|
||||||
|
STATUS: N_SLOTS=4 @ 64MHz remains the frozen production baseline (8/8
|
||||||
|
PASS, real positive margin on every seed). N_SLOTS=8 @ 64MHz OPEN,
|
||||||
|
improved but not closed (5/8 PASS). 80MHz NO-GO at either N_SLOTS,
|
||||||
|
reconfirmed on the fixed RTL. File changed: hardware/v2/nms/rtl/
|
||||||
|
sdram_unified_backend.v.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -1375,3 +1375,91 @@ STATUS: PARTIALLY RESOLVED. N_SLOTS=4 fully reliable at 64MHz (8/8
|
|||||||
seeds). N_SLOTS=8 significantly improved but OPEN -- 5/8 seeds close
|
seeds). N_SLOTS=8 significantly improved but OPEN -- 5/8 seeds close
|
||||||
timing at 64MHz, 3/8 do not. File changed: hardware/v2/nms/rtl/
|
timing at 64MHz, 3/8 do not. File changed: hardware/v2/nms/rtl/
|
||||||
nms_activation_fill_ctrl_v3.v.
|
nms_activation_fill_ctrl_v3.v.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
NOTE (2026-09-07, re-measurement): a fresh, full 8-seed P&R matrix run
|
||||||
|
under ERR-0029's own investigation (below) found N_SLOTS=8 @ 64MHz
|
||||||
|
PRE-FIX pass count to actually be 4/8 (seeds 2,3,5,6 PASS; 0,1,4,7
|
||||||
|
FAIL; worst seed1 55.84MHz/WNS=-2.284ns), not the 5/8 recorded above --
|
||||||
|
the "5/8" figure came from an earlier, less exhaustive P&R pass and is
|
||||||
|
SUPERSEDED by this note and by MEMORY_UPGRADE_64MB_N8.md's own tables.
|
||||||
|
This does not change ERR-0028's fix or its STATUS, only the precise
|
||||||
|
pass-count evidence.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
ERR-0029 -- sdram_unified_backend.v: serial "last-match-wins" weight-
|
||||||
|
cache hit-index scan was the N_SLOTS=8 @ 64MHz critical path
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
DATE: 2026-09-07
|
||||||
|
FOUND DURING: the user's own mandated exhaustive final-verification
|
||||||
|
pass (all 8 seeds, 4 configs: N=4/N=8 x 64/80MHz) plus an explicit,
|
||||||
|
user-directed root-cause investigation into the N_SLOTS=8 @ 64MHz
|
||||||
|
worst-case critical path (real nextpnr-ecp5 P&R report.json, seed1:
|
||||||
|
Fmax=55.84MHz, WNS=-2.284ns, total delay 17.909ns, 84% routing).
|
||||||
|
ROOT CAUSE: `sdram_unified_backend.v`'s W-port cache (W_ENTRIES=4,
|
||||||
|
NOT parameterized by N_SLOTS -- confirmed by inspecting its only
|
||||||
|
instantiation, in nms_neural_multiprocessor_sdram_unified.v, which
|
||||||
|
overrides neither W_ENTRIES nor ADDR_WIDTH's dependents) computed its
|
||||||
|
hit index with a sequential `for (ei=0;ei<W_ENTRIES;ei=ei+1) if
|
||||||
|
(w_cache_valid[ei] && w_cache_addr[ei]==w_addr) ... w_hit_idx_c=ei;`
|
||||||
|
loop -- "last valid+matching entry wins" by unconditional overwrite,
|
||||||
|
with each iteration's result depending on the previous one. Yosys/
|
||||||
|
nextpnr-ecp5 synthesized this as a serially-dependent cascade of
|
||||||
|
PFUMX/OFX ECP5 fast-mux primitives (confirmed via the real critical-
|
||||||
|
path segment dump: w_cache_valid[2] -> nested PFUMX/OFX chain ->
|
||||||
|
w_hit_idx_c -> further LUT cascade -> control logic gating w_rdata's
|
||||||
|
own clock enable). Because W_ENTRIES stays fixed at 4 regardless of
|
||||||
|
N_SLOTS, this logic's OWN complexity does not grow with N_SLOTS -- the
|
||||||
|
real cause of the N=8-specific slowdown is that N=8's larger overall
|
||||||
|
design (double the slot_mem_arbiter_wide/weight_prefetch_engine_wide
|
||||||
|
instances of N=4) forces nextpnr to spread placement further across
|
||||||
|
the die, stretching the SAME serially-dependent logic chain over
|
||||||
|
longer physical routes: 3 of 5 major hops measured at 2.5-2.8ns each
|
||||||
|
(typical local ECP5 routing is 0.3-0.9ns), confirming routing
|
||||||
|
distance, not logic complexity or LUT/FF utilization (25.2%/25.4% at
|
||||||
|
N=8, far from the device ceiling), as the dominant cost -- exactly as
|
||||||
|
diagnosed from the real segment data before any fix was attempted.
|
||||||
|
FIX: replaced the serial priority-scan with a flat, fully parallel
|
||||||
|
one-hot compare (`w_match_oh[ei] = w_cache_valid[ei] && w_cache_addr
|
||||||
|
[ei]==w_addr`, W_ENTRIES independent comparators, no inter-entry
|
||||||
|
dependency, via a `generate`/`genvar` block) followed by a single-
|
||||||
|
level `casez` priority encode reproducing the EXACT original "highest
|
||||||
|
index wins" semantics bit-for-bit. Guarded behind `if (W_ENTRIES==4)`
|
||||||
|
(the only real, instantiated configuration in this project) with a
|
||||||
|
fallback branch preserving the original scan for any other W_ENTRIES
|
||||||
|
value, matching this project's own established fix pattern (ERR-0028).
|
||||||
|
Purely combinational, same-cycle, zero latency change -- w_ready/
|
||||||
|
w_rdata timing behavior is externally unchanged.
|
||||||
|
VERIFICATION (bit-exact): isolated `tb_sdram_unified_backend.v`, real
|
||||||
|
Verilator 5.050, 40/40 PASS, identical to pre-fix. Full D-Stress
|
||||||
|
regression (real Verilator, golden-model comparison), both N_SLOTS=4
|
||||||
|
(49927 cycles, 256/256 neurons bit-exact) and N_SLOTS=8 (49909 cycles,
|
||||||
|
256/256 neurons bit-exact) -- PASS, zero functional regression.
|
||||||
|
VERIFICATION (timing, real nextpnr-ecp5, fresh 32-seed matrix: N=4/N=8
|
||||||
|
x 64/80MHz, 8 seeds each, POST-FIX):
|
||||||
|
N=4 @ 64MHz: 8/8 seeds PASS (unchanged pass count), but worst-case
|
||||||
|
margin DROPPED: Fmax 70.68/66.58/74.74/71.98/74.48/75.65/67.41/
|
||||||
|
68.47 MHz (worst seed1 66.58MHz, WNS=+0.605ns -- down from the
|
||||||
|
PRE-FIX worst of 74.17MHz/WNS=+2.143ns). Real cause: the FIX moved
|
||||||
|
the N=4 critical path OFF the (now-shortened) hit-index chain and
|
||||||
|
onto a DIFFERENT, previously-second-worst path inside the same
|
||||||
|
module (mostly u_arbiter_wide.m_addr -> u_sdram_backend.state/
|
||||||
|
ctrl_wdata), which this specific placement seed happens to route
|
||||||
|
less favorably than the original hit-index path did. Still a real,
|
||||||
|
honest 8/8 PASS -- not a hardware concern by the mandate's own
|
||||||
|
numeric acceptance criteria -- but a disclosed, measured trade-off,
|
||||||
|
not hidden.
|
||||||
|
N=8 @ 64MHz: PASS COUNT IMPROVED, 4/8 -> 5/8 (seeds 0,1,3,4,5 PASS;
|
||||||
|
2,6,7 FAIL). Worst-case improved: Fmax 66.45/65.28/61.21/66.96/
|
||||||
|
66.66/65.71/60.12/62.70 MHz (worst seed6: 60.12MHz, WNS=-1.009ns --
|
||||||
|
up from the PRE-FIX worst of 55.84MHz/WNS=-2.284ns). Real,
|
||||||
|
measured improvement, not yet full closure.
|
||||||
|
N=4/N=8 @ 80MHz: unchanged conclusion, still 0/8 PASS both configs
|
||||||
|
(identical achieved-Fmax values to the 64MHz-labeled netlists,
|
||||||
|
confirming the fabric's achievable ceiling, not the PLL target, is
|
||||||
|
the limit) -- NO-GO, as before.
|
||||||
|
STATUS: N_SLOTS=8 measurably improved (not fully closed: 3/8 seeds
|
||||||
|
still fail at 64MHz, now failing through a DIFFERENT critical path than
|
||||||
|
before -- see MEMORY_UPGRADE_64MB_N8.md for the updated worst-case
|
||||||
|
trace). N_SLOTS=4 remains 8/8 PASS at 64MHz but with reduced margin,
|
||||||
|
disclosed above -- flagged, not hidden, per this project's own real-
|
||||||
|
data-only reporting standard. File changed: hardware/v2/nms/rtl/
|
||||||
|
sdram_unified_backend.v.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -123,19 +123,64 @@ module sdram_unified_backend #(
|
|||||||
reg [63:0] w_cache_data [0:W_ENTRIES-1];
|
reg [63:0] w_cache_data [0:W_ENTRIES-1];
|
||||||
reg [WEIDXW-1:0] w_alloc_ptr;
|
reg [WEIDXW-1:0] w_alloc_ptr;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// ERR-0029 fix (N=8 @64MHz critical-path, measured via real P&R:
|
||||||
|
// worst seed1 total delay 17.909ns, 84% routing, dominant hop
|
||||||
|
// 2.5-2.8ns): the original RTL used a sequential for-loop that
|
||||||
|
// overwrites w_hit_idx_c on every match ("last valid+matching entry
|
||||||
|
// wins"), which Yosys/nextpnr synthesized as a serially-dependent
|
||||||
|
// cascade of PFUMX/OFX fast-mux primitives -- each entry's result
|
||||||
|
// depends on the previous one, forcing nextpnr to place the whole
|
||||||
|
// chain along one physical path with no freedom to shorten it. This
|
||||||
|
// is the same architectural fix class as ERR-0028 (activation_fill_
|
||||||
|
// ctrl's max-tree): replace the serial dependency chain with a flat
|
||||||
|
// one-hot compare (fully parallel, W_ENTRIES=4 comparators, no
|
||||||
|
// inter-entry dependency) followed by a single-level priority-encode
|
||||||
|
// casez, preserving the EXACT original "highest index wins" semantics
|
||||||
|
// bit-for-bit (verified: original loop always ends on the highest ei
|
||||||
|
// that matched, since ei counts up without break).
|
||||||
|
wire [W_ENTRIES-1:0] w_match_oh;
|
||||||
|
genvar wgi;
|
||||||
|
generate
|
||||||
|
for (wgi = 0; wgi < W_ENTRIES; wgi = wgi + 1) begin : GEN_WMATCH
|
||||||
|
assign w_match_oh[wgi] = w_cache_valid[wgi] && (w_cache_addr[wgi] == w_addr);
|
||||||
|
end
|
||||||
|
endgenerate
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
reg w_hit_found_c;
|
reg w_hit_found_c;
|
||||||
reg [WEIDXW-1:0] w_hit_idx_c;
|
reg [WEIDXW-1:0] w_hit_idx_c;
|
||||||
integer ei;
|
integer ei;
|
||||||
always @(*) begin
|
generate
|
||||||
w_hit_found_c = 1'b0;
|
if (W_ENTRIES == 4) begin : GEN_WHIT_FLAT
|
||||||
w_hit_idx_c = {WEIDXW{1'b0}};
|
// real, measured configuration (see ERR-0029) -- flat,
|
||||||
for (ei = 0; ei < W_ENTRIES; ei = ei + 1) begin
|
// single-level priority encode over the parallel one-hot
|
||||||
if (w_cache_valid[ei] && w_cache_addr[ei] == w_addr) begin
|
// compare above, no serial inter-entry dependency.
|
||||||
w_hit_found_c = 1'b1;
|
always @(*) begin
|
||||||
w_hit_idx_c = ei[WEIDXW-1:0];
|
w_hit_found_c = |w_match_oh;
|
||||||
|
casez (w_match_oh)
|
||||||
|
4'b1???: w_hit_idx_c = 2'd3;
|
||||||
|
4'b01??: w_hit_idx_c = 2'd2;
|
||||||
|
4'b001?: w_hit_idx_c = 2'd1;
|
||||||
|
4'b0001: w_hit_idx_c = 2'd0;
|
||||||
|
default: w_hit_idx_c = {WEIDXW{1'b0}};
|
||||||
|
endcase
|
||||||
|
end
|
||||||
|
end else begin : GEN_WHIT_FALLBACK
|
||||||
|
// any other W_ENTRIES value: fall back to the original,
|
||||||
|
// functionally-equivalent (but serially-dependent) scan --
|
||||||
|
// not the measured/optimized configuration this project
|
||||||
|
// actually builds, kept only for parametric safety.
|
||||||
|
always @(*) begin
|
||||||
|
w_hit_found_c = 1'b0;
|
||||||
|
w_hit_idx_c = {WEIDXW{1'b0}};
|
||||||
|
for (ei = 0; ei < W_ENTRIES; ei = ei + 1) begin
|
||||||
|
if (w_cache_valid[ei] && w_cache_addr[ei] == w_addr) begin
|
||||||
|
w_hit_found_c = 1'b1;
|
||||||
|
w_hit_idx_c = ei[WEIDXW-1:0];
|
||||||
|
end
|
||||||
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
endgenerate
|
||||||
wire w_cache_hit = w_hit_found_c && w_req;
|
wire w_cache_hit = w_hit_found_c && w_req;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// ============================================================
|
// ============================================================
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user