diff --git a/hardware/v2/docs/datasheet/files/docs/datasheet/v2-en/FPGA-Neural-V2-Datasheet-EN.pdf b/hardware/v2/docs/datasheet/files/docs/datasheet/v2-en/FPGA-Neural-V2-Datasheet-EN.pdf
index 69587c9..f1abcb7 100644
Binary files a/hardware/v2/docs/datasheet/files/docs/datasheet/v2-en/FPGA-Neural-V2-Datasheet-EN.pdf and b/hardware/v2/docs/datasheet/files/docs/datasheet/v2-en/FPGA-Neural-V2-Datasheet-EN.pdf differ
diff --git a/hardware/v2/docs/datasheet/files/docs/datasheet/v2-en/chapters/07-hostinterface.tex b/hardware/v2/docs/datasheet/files/docs/datasheet/v2-en/chapters/07-hostinterface.tex
index 732edec..26702c7 100644
--- a/hardware/v2/docs/datasheet/files/docs/datasheet/v2-en/chapters/07-hostinterface.tex
+++ b/hardware/v2/docs/datasheet/files/docs/datasheet/v2-en/chapters/07-hostinterface.tex
@@ -51,15 +51,61 @@ project uses for verification.
 
 \section{What a real host driver would still need to add}
 \begin{itemize}
-\item A physical transport (SPI, parallel bus, or otherwise) carrying
-      the fields of \S\ref{ch:host}'s own table across a real pin
-      interface --- not designed in this revision.
-\item A completion-notification path back to the host (V1's own
-      \code{data\_ready\_n}/\code{STATUS.done} has no V2 analogue yet);
-      today, completion is only observable internally
-      (\code{dir\_job\_out\_done}) or by polling the expected result
-      address.
 \item Per-job \code{bias}/\code{activation} selection, currently
       hardcoded to \code{bias=0}/\code{ACT\_RELU} for every job
       (\S\ref{ch:datapath}).
 \end{itemize}
+
+\section{Addendum (2026-09-07) --- real physical transport and
+completion signal, both now closed}
+\label{sec:host-addendum}
+\begin{fnwarn}[Supersedes the two items removed from the list above]
+Both real gaps this chapter used to list are closed. This section is
+the current, real state.
+\end{fnwarn}
+
+\textbf{Physical transport}: \code{spi\_host\_bridge.v}, a real SPI
+Mode~0 slave, is the board's actual node-registration transport ---
+real ball assignments (\code{spi\_sclk}/\code{spi\_mosi}/
+\code{spi\_miso}/\code{spi\_cs\_n}) verified, real place\&route (see
+ch.~\ref{ch:hw}). WRITE\_JOB carries the full table from
+\S\ref{ch:host} above as an 18-byte payload (grew from 15 after the
+64MB memory upgrade widened every address field from 3 to 4 bytes ---
+\code{decisions.log} DEC-0039).
+
+\textbf{Completion notification}: \code{FPGA\_DATA\_READY}, a real
+output pin (ball \code{G3}, bank~7), closes the exact gap this
+chapter used to flag. It is a system-idle detector, not a per-job
+pulse --- deliberately, since ``the whole graph has an answer'' and
+``one neuron finished'' are different questions and only the former is
+useful to a host waiting on a result:
+\[
+\text{sys\_busy} = \big(\textstyle\bigvee \text{job\_active}\big)
+\;\lor\; \lnot\text{queue\_empty} \;\lor\; \text{any\_pending}
+\]
+where \code{job\_active} is per-slot (already real, \S\ref{ch:sched}),
+\code{queue\_empty} is \code{neural\_director.v}'s own dispatch-queue
+occupancy, and \code{any\_pending} (new) is an OR-reduce over
+dependency\_manager's own node table for any node still
+\code{WAITING} or \code{READY} (i.e. registered but not yet
+dispatched --- \code{DISPATCHED} nodes are tracked by the two signals
+above instead, not here). \code{FPGA\_DATA\_READY} is a sticky
+register: set on the \code{sys\_busy} $1\to0$ edge, cleared the
+instant \code{sys\_busy} goes high again --- self-clearing, no host
+acknowledgement command needed.
+
+\begin{fnnote}[Real, disclosed assumption]
+This is correct only if the host finishes registering every node of a
+graph before the first one completes. Realistic for this
+architecture's own real timing (SPI registration: microseconds;
+per-neuron compute: $\sim$195 real measured cycles, \S\ref{ch:impl2})
+but not proven for every conceivable host registration pattern --- a
+host that deliberately staggers registration across a long enough gap
+could observe a premature \code{FPGA\_DATA\_READY} pulse after only
+the first node completes.
+\end{fnnote}
+
+Bit-exact regression re-verified with an explicit assertion on this
+signal (N\_SLOTS=4 and 8, both PASS, see \code{decisions.log}
+DEC-0041) and a real \code{nextpnr-ecp5} placement check (0 errors,
+\code{data\_ready} placed at \code{G3}).
diff --git a/hardware/v2/docs/datasheet/files/docs/datasheet/v2-en/chapters/10-hardware.tex b/hardware/v2/docs/datasheet/files/docs/datasheet/v2-en/chapters/10-hardware.tex
index d589043..935da36 100644
--- a/hardware/v2/docs/datasheet/files/docs/datasheet/v2-en/chapters/10-hardware.tex
+++ b/hardware/v2/docs/datasheet/files/docs/datasheet/v2-en/chapters/10-hardware.tex
@@ -245,3 +245,73 @@ the user is preparing separately.
 FPGA-TN-02038-2.0 \S3--4. Full schematic capture (BOM, connectors,
 FPGA--RAM/FLASH and PROG sections) pending separately.}
 \end{center}
+
+\section{Programming architecture (2026-09-07) --- two independent
+flash devices, ESP32 over JTAG only}
+\label{sec:prog-addendum}
+\begin{fnwarn}[Real, closed design -- not a placeholder]
+Converged after evaluating and rejecting a single-shared-flash and an
+SSPI-every-boot alternative (see \code{decisions.log} DEC-0041 for the
+full comparison). This is the current, real architecture.
+\end{fnwarn}
+
+\subsection{Two physically separate flash chips}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item \textbf{Flash \#1} --- neural-network weights/graph data.
+      V1's own real subsystem (\code{flash\_copy\_engine.v}/
+      \code{flash\_slot\_manager.v}), 4 ordinary GPIO balls. V1's own
+      real balls (\code{flash\_sclk}=E3, \code{flash\_mosi}=D3,
+      \code{flash\_miso}=D5, \code{flash\_cs\_n}=E4) are \textbf{not}
+      reusable in V2 --- confirmed conflict, all four already carry
+      V2's own SDRAM bus. New balls reserved (bank~7, 3.3\,V):
+      \code{flash\_sclk}=B2, \code{flash\_mosi}=E2,
+      \code{flash\_miso}=F2, \code{flash\_cs\_n}=F3. \textbf{Not yet
+      in the LPF} --- the RTL port does not exist in
+      \code{fpga\_neural\_v2\_top.v} yet (a real, separate, open
+      integration task).
+\item \textbf{Flash \#2} --- boot bitstream only. Connects
+      exclusively to the ECP5's own dedicated sysCONFIG pins, Master
+      SPI mode, auto-boots every power-up, zero ESP32 involvement in
+      normal operation.
+\end{itemize}
+
+\subsection{ESP32 $\leftrightarrow$ ECP5: JTAG only}
+Neither ESP32-S3 nor ESP32-C6 has a hardware JTAG \emph{master}
+peripheral (verified against Espressif's own documentation): their
+native ``USB Serial/JTAG Controller'' lets an external host debug the
+ESP32 itself --- the wrong direction for driving the ECP5. TCK/TMS/
+TDI/TDO are therefore bit-banged from ordinary ESP32 GPIO, standard
+practice. ESP32 updates flash~\#2 by commanding the ECP5's own
+internal sysCONFIG engine to bridge JTAG writes through to the
+external flash (real Lattice mechanism, FPGA-TN-02038-2.0 Figure~6.3,
+``Programming external Flash via JTAG'') --- ESP32 never drives
+flash~\#2's own SPI pins directly, zero bus contention by
+construction.
+
+\subsection{Real ball assignments (CABGA381)}
+From the official Lattice pinout CSV (\code{FPGA-SC-02034-3-0-
+ECP5U-45-Pinout.csv} rev.\,3.0) cross-checked against Project
+Trellis's \code{iodb.json}.
+
+\begin{fnnote}[JTAG (bank 40/TAP) --- to ESP32]
+TCK=T5, TMS=U5, TDI=R5, TDO=V4.
+\end{fnnote}
+\begin{fnnote}[Dedicated config (bank 8) --- to ESP32]
+PROGRAMN=W3, INITN=V3, DONE=Y3.
+\end{fnnote}
+\begin{fnnote}[CFG{[}2:0{]} (bank 8) --- board jumpers/0$\Omega$, NOT to ESP32]
+For MSPI, CFG[2:0]$=$[0,1,0] read MSB-first: CFG\_2(R4)$=$GND,
+CFG\_1(T4)$=$pull-up 1--10\,k$\Omega$ to VCCIO8, CFG\_0(U4)$=$GND.
+\end{fnnote}
+\begin{fnnote}[MSPI dedicated/dual-function pins to flash \#2 (bank 8) --- NOT to ESP32]
+MCLK/CCLK=U3, CSSPIN=R2 (dual w/ HOLDN/DI/BUSY/CEN), D0/MOSI=W2,
+D1/MISO=V2.
+\end{fnnote}
+
+Confirmed real and safe (Lattice FPGA-TN-02039-2.3 sysCONFIG User
+Guide, \S6.1.2): once User Mode is reached, the MSPI dedicated pins
+tristate with a weak pull-up, so they never contend with another
+driver on the same net --- not load-bearing for this specific
+two-chip architecture (flash \#1/\#2 are physically separate), but
+confirms the mechanism is real should a future revision ever share a
+single chip.